Profile visit and connection request
Day 1 · LinkedIn connection noteHi {{firstName}}, I work with {{role}}s in {{industry}} and liked your take on {{topic}}. Would be good to connect.
Templates
Six touches over two weeks, alternating email and LinkedIn so the prospect sees one consistent conversation.
Hi {{firstName}}, I work with {{role}}s in {{industry}} and liked your take on {{topic}}. Would be good to connect.
Subject: {{problem}} at {{company}}
Hi {{firstName}}, {{reasonForWriting}}. Teams at that stage usually run into {{problem}}. We help companies like {{peerCompany}} {{outcome}}. Is this on your radar this quarter? {{senderName}}
Thanks for connecting, {{firstName}}. I sent you a short note by email about {{problem}}. Easier to chat here if you prefer.
Subject: Re: {{problem}} at {{company}}
Hi {{firstName}}, One number that might be relevant: {{peerCompany}} {{resultWithNumber}} within {{timeframe}}. Worth 15 minutes to see if {{company}} could do the same? {{senderName}}
Hi {{firstName}}, would a two-line summary of how {{peerCompany}} set this up be useful? Happy to send it here.
Subject: Closing the loop
Hi {{firstName}}, I will stop here so I do not crowd your inbox. If {{problem}} becomes a priority, just reply and I will pick it up. {{senderName}}
Starting from new mailboxes? See when they are warmed up enough to run this sequence. Warmup schedule calculator →
Usually yes. Seeing the same person on two channels builds familiarity, and some people simply prefer one channel. The key is coordination: one topic, spaced-out steps and a full stop on reply.
Five to seven touches over two to three weeks is common. Longer sequences add little and risk annoying people.
Yes. Reachbox runs email and LinkedIn steps in one sequence and, by default, stops the sequence when the lead replies. Many teams also do it by hand with a task list.